According to Laura Clouting, the First World War curator at the Imperial War Museum in London, attitudes toward wearing the poppy have shifted significantly over time. In a video on the museum’s website, she explains that the red poppy has come to represent the sacrifice and efforts of armed forces in recent conflicts.
“It has now come to symbolise the sacrifice and effort of the armed forces in more recent conflicts,” says Clouting.
However, because many recent conflicts are complex and morally ambiguous, the poppy has become a more debated and divisive symbol. Clouting points out that the red poppy (distinct from the white poppy, which promotes peace) has been appropriated by far-right groups. Some critics associate the poppy with controversial actions of Britain's military, such as in Northern Ireland.
“Those who object see it as being connected with the actions of Britain’s army, for example in Northern Ireland.”
People who grew up in Northern Ireland during the 1960s and 1970s hold a nuanced understanding of how history and symbolism can divide. Many children played with physical reminders of war—like their fathers' and grandfathers' steel helmets, old ammunition clips, and water flasks—which served as family connections to those who fought in two world wars.
Both the British Legion and the Imperial War Museum emphasize that wearing the poppy should never be mandatory. It is a personal symbol, meaningful to many but not all, especially considering its contested meanings.
“Nobody should be forced to wear the contentious symbol - take it from the British Legion and Imperial War Museum.”
The poppy's meaning is evolving from a unifying symbol of military sacrifice to a contested emblem reflecting complex historical and political debates, highlighting the importance of personal choice.